4-1-2022 | News
The degree to which an architect can mitigate the climate impacts of a building often depends on the degree to which that building’s owner is on board. Clients vary, of course, and some are going to be more open than others to the idea of doing whatever it takes to help preserve a livable planet. But if a client is at least agnostic, a conversation can make the difference between, say, an affordable-housing project that addresses emergency needs with a gas-powered generator and one that uses battery-stored solar while also reducing residents’ energy bills. Or the difference between a project that minimizes its embodied carbon and one that offsets it. So how are firms with ambitious climate commitments navigating these client discussions? What strategies are making a difference?
***FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE*** SEATTLE (Dec. 18, 2018) — The Miller Hull Partnership, an international, award-winning architecture…
12-18-2018 | News
By Scott Judy While contractors continue to deal with unprecedented disruptions, ENR Southeast’s annual Best Projects…
8-7-2020 | News
The Seattle-based architecture firm’s proposal for the American School in Quito’s new Puembo campus places third…
3-28-2024 | News
Metropolis’s Planet Positive Awards recognizes the most creative projects and products from around the world that…
9-30-2021 | News
On October 24th and 25th, the Affordable Housing Summit will spotlight innovative strategies in affordable housing.…
10-4-2024 | Events
By Ruth Baleiko and Elizabeth Moggio The Kitsap and Olympic peninsulas region is currently one of…
12-17-2024 | News